R&H Logo
If a copy of a will has been accepted by the court but is now being contested who has the burden of proving that the will is not valid
May 23, 2024
Probate
Close Menu IconThe information provided is for general information and does not form an attorney-client relationship. See our .
Bill HenryFounding Partner | 18 years of experience
Profile Picture of Attorney Bill Henry
Profile Picture of Attorney Bill Henry
Bill HenryFounding Partner 18 years of experience

In Colorado, the burden of proving that a will is not valid falls on the party contesting the will. This is because once a will has been accepted by the court, it is considered prima facie evidence of its due attestation, execution, and validity. Therefore, the contestants of the will have the responsibility to establish grounds for contesting the will, such as lack of testamentary intent or capacity, undue influence, fraud, duress, mistake, or revocation. C.R.S. § 15-12-407.

In Aquilini v. Chamblin, the court upheld the principle that in a contest of a will which has been duly admitted to probate, the burden of proof is on the contestant to establish his grounds of contest. The court affirmed that the probate is held to be prima facie evidence of the due attestation, execution, and validity of the will, and the burden is upon the contestants. Aquilini v. Chamblin, 94 Colo. 367, 30 P.2d 325 (1934)

Disclaimer
The response provided is based on the available information and is not intended to constitute a comprehensive answer to the inquiry. The only manner to obtain complete and adequate legal advice is to consult with an attorney. Please be advised that no communication, including Q&A postings, through this website establishes an attorney-client privilege, and such exchanges do not create an attorney-client relationship and will not be treated as confidential. The information presented is general information only and should not be relied upon to take, or fail to take, legal action.
Didn’t find what you were looking for?