Coloradans love their dogs; for many, dogs are loyal companions, adventure buddies and beloved members of the family. Unfortunately, sometimes those loyal buddies react to a situation where they feel scared or threatened by biting a person or another dog. Therefore, it’s important that Colorado dog owners understand our state’s dog bite law and how it might impact them in the event their pet injures someone.
It’s also important that in the event your dog does cause harm to a person, or even another dog or other animal, you schedule an assessment right away with an attorney in Robinson & Henry’s Denver, Castle Rock or Colorado Springs criminal defense practice. Contact us at 303-688-0944 to request an appointment now.
Colorado’s dog bite statute (C.R.S 13-21-124) is a strict liability statute; for Colorado dog owners, this means if your dog bites someone you could be held liable, even if you were unaware that your dog was dangerous, aggressive or capable of the offense and even if you tried to restrain the dog.
Under this statute you can be held liable if:
The statute defines bodily injury as, “any physical injury that results in severe bruising, muscle tears or skin lacerations requiring professional medical treatment or any physical injury that requires corrective or cosmetic surgery.”
A serious bodily injury is defined as, “an injury that involves a substantial risk of death, serious permanent disfigurement, loss or impairment of a bodily function or organ or a break, fracture or second- or third-degree burn.”
What it does and does not cover:
If your dog has bitten someone, and the bite resulted in a serious injury, then the person your dog bit can file a lawsuit against you, which could result in you having to pay a significant sum or euthanasia for your companion. You may also face criminal charges from the State of Colorado for owning a dangerous dog.
If your dog has bitten someone and you are facing a lawsuit or criminal charges, it’s important to speak with an attorney as soon as possible to protect both yourself and your dog. Robinson & Henry’s criminal defense team can help. Contact us to request an assessment.
Colorado does have the one bite rule, which is a common law rule that becomes relevant when a state doesn’t have a dog bite statute or in cases where the state’s statute doesn’t apply. The one bite rule allows a dog owner to assume his/her dog is not dangerous until the dog displays behavior that proves otherwise.
That being said, Colorado’s revised statute for dog bites (C.R.S. 13-21-124) means that the one bite rule no longer applies in all cases. If a dog bite causes serious bodily harm, a dog owner could be liable regardless of whether he/she knew the dog was dangerous.
While the rule is casually referred to as the one bite rule, this doesn’t necessarily mean a dog gets one “free” bite. On the contrary, there are a variety of behaviors – in addition to biting – that should put a dog owner on notice that his/her dog is dangerous and has the potential to harm someone.
It’s important for Colorado dog owners to be aware of which types of behaviors could be labeled as dangerous, including:
The statute of limitations for a dog bite (or other injury caused by a dog) in Colorado is two years. That means an individual has two years from the date the injury occurred to file a lawsuit against the dog’s owner if he/she believes the owner is responsible for the injury. If the person who was bitten attempts to file a lawsuit after the statute of limitations has passed, the court can and likely will throw out the case.
Colorado’s Dangerous Dog Statue (§ 18-9-204.5), “Unlawful ownership of a dangerous dog,” defines a dangerous dog as one that meets one or more of the following criteria:
Under this statute, an owner is “any person, firm, corporation or organization owning, possessing, harboring, keeping, having financial or property interest in or having control or custody of an animal.”
This statute makes it a crime to own a dangerous dog.
Some cities in Colorado have breed-specific legislation, wherein specific breeds are considered dangerous and residents are banned from owning them.
Denver is among a number of Colorado towns with dog breed restrictions.
Dog owners found guilty of ownership of a dangerous dog face criminal punishment, the severity of which depends on the severity of the injury or damage caused by the dog, as well as the number of times the owner has violated the Dangerous Dog Statute. If the dog causes bodily injury to a person, the owner could face misdemeanor penalties. If the dog causes the death of a person, the owner could face felony charges, with punishment ranging from steep fines to prison time.
These charges range from a fine of $50 to $750 and/or up to six months in jail for first-time, non-aggravated, non-serious injuries, and go as far as $1,000 to $100,000 and/or one year to three years in prison for injuries that cause death.
Punishment typically always requires the owner to pay restitution. In the case where the dog harms a person, restitution covers out-of-pocket medical expenses, plus any anticipated future expenses. In addition, the victim could file a civil suit against the owner to recoup damages for pain and suffering.
If the dog injures another dog or other domestic animal, restitution will cover medical expenses or, in the event that the dangerous dog kills a domestic animal, the replacement cost or fair market value of the animal.
Similarly, if the dangerous dog destroys property, the owner will likely pay restitution for the fair market value or replacement value of the property.
Many homeowner’s insurance policies will cover injuries and property damage caused by dogs, even if the policy owner’s dog is at fault, though most exclude dangerous breeds.
In addition to the penalties listed above, the Dangerous Dog Statute requires that the dangerous dog be confiscated and placed in a public animal shelter at the owner’s expense.
The dog could subsequently be ordered to be euthanized by a licensed veterinarian if the owner pleaded guilty, was found guilty or entered into a deferred judgment or deferred prosecution agreement of a charge that resulted in:
The owner does have the right to appeal the decision and the dog will not be euthanized until the right to appeal is exhausted or the conviction is successfully appealed.
In cases where the dangerous dog does not cause serious bodily injury or death and the dog is not confiscated, the owner is required to take certain precautions to both confine the dog and to register it with the state. Those precautions are:
If you’ve been charged with ownership of a dangerous dog and/or if you’re facing civil charges as a result of your dog’s actions, it’s important to call Robinson & Henry right away to schedule an assessment with an attorney in our criminal defense practice. Given the stakes – steep fines, possible jail time or even your dog’s life – it’s critical to hire an experienced attorney, who will be able to build a defense based on a clear understanding of the law and knowledge of past cases.
Dog bite cases in Colorado are brought under either Colorado’s strict liability statute or as a common-law negligence claim. A dog owner’s defense strategy will depend on which claim type the case falls under.
In a strict liability case, the focus will be on proving the dog owner is not liable. Typically that means proving one of the following circumstances were in play at the time of the incident:
The dog:
The injured person:
In a negligence-based case, the defenses commonly used are “comparative negligence” and trespassing.
The trespassing defense is used when the injured person was on the dog owner’s property without permission and without another legitimate reason for being there.
If the injured person provoked the dog, then the comparative negligence defense may be used. Colorado has a modified comparative fault rule, which can be used when more than one individual is to blame for an injury. Under this rule damages can be reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to the injured person as long as that percentage is less than 50 percent; if it’s greater than 50 percent, then the injured person is unable to collect damages.