Your position as a shareholder means a lot to you, even if you only own a minority share. Unfortunately, the majority owners could see your position differently, and might not welcome your participation in company affairs. You should have a voice, but the majority shareholders simply prefer doing things their way. This is shareholder oppression. This article will help you better understand your rights as a minority shareholder under Colorado law.
It’s true that being a minority shareholder doesn’t give you as much power as a majority shareholder, but you are not powerless.
All shareholders in a company have rights and abilities. Generally, they include the:
These rights are sometimes limited for minority shareholders, as their influence is based on the number of shares they hold. This creates the risk of minority shareholder oppression, which is the tendency for majority shareholders to abuse their powers to the detriment of the minority.
For example, majority owners can become greedy, steering the company by decisions that benefit only them — often harming the company as a whole, or its minority owners. Majority shareholders may take unnecessary risks since their majority status protects them from punishment.
A shareholder is a person or institution that owns at least one share of a company’s stock or mutual fund. Shareholders essentially own the company, which comes with certain rights, responsibilities, and rewards when the company is doing well. For example, a shareholder in a successful company can earn income from dividend payments.
Because majority shareholders wield such influence over a company’s direction, Colorado law requires that corporate officers and directors adhere to certain standards.
Officers and directors have a duty to act in the best interest of the corporation and all of its shareholders. They may not oppress the rights of minority shareholders. That means they may not benefit at the expense —or to the exclusion— of the rights of minority owners. Colorado Revised Statutes 7-108-401
The statutory language only says that directors and officers must act in the interest of all shareholders to benefit the whole company.
In reality, however, the actions of the company tend to be dictated by the majority shareholders. They have the power to appoint or remove officers who manage the day to day operations of the business, and do not expect much input from minority owners.
The Colorado General Assembly has not statutorily defined what specific conduct constitutes oppression, however, the courts have spoken in a few cases and defined it as:
“Burdensome, harsh and wrongful conduct; a lack of probity and fair dealing in the affairs of the company to the prejudice of some of its members; or a … departure from the standards of fair dealing, and a violation of fair play on which every shareholder who entrusts his money to a company is entitled to rely.” Polk v. Hergert Land & Cattle Co., (Colo. Ct. App. 2000)
Also, deciding whether oppressive actions have occurred “requires consideration of the reasonable expectations of minority shareholders” including expectation that the controlling interest will comply with the law and “promote the purpose of the corporation.” Colt v. Mt. Princeton Trout Club, Inc., (Colo. Ct. App. 2003).
Without legal protection, a minority shareholder’s investment and expectations are subject to the whims of majority shareholders. Colorado law protects all shareholders and safeguards the interests of minority shareholders.
Shareholder rights include, but are not limited to:
— Colorado Revised Statutes, Title VII, Articles 107 to 108
These protections prevent a minority shareholder’s investment and expectations from being harmed by those in control of the corporation.
The rights listed above are heightened when it comes to closely held corporations; companies owned exclusively by a closed, smaller group of individuals.
Such ownership groups are often made up of early investors, old friends, family members, and/or longstanding employees who might not have the expertise of a larger corporation’s elected board of directors. Therefore, conflicts can be common and are often quite disruptive.
Controlling shareholders in a closely held corporation are like partners in a partnership. They owe the highest degree of loyalty and trust, must exercise good faith in their decisions, and may not use their power to harm the other shareholders.
Minority shareholders can obtain a range of remedies, depending on the type of legal action they bring against a company’s officers and majority shareholders.
For example, in a breach of trust or fiduciary loyalty lawsuit, a successful lawsuit by minority shareholders can result in one or more of the following actions:
Many cases brought against controlling shareholders by the minority belong not to any individual owner, but to the company itself. If this is the case, then the shareholders can bring a “derivative action” in the name of the company for the requested relief. Derivative lawsuits carry their own sets of rules, so it’s important to speak with a commercial or business litigation attorney to determine possible remedies and causes of action before filing suit.
Ownership, partnership, and shareholder disputes can be stressful and costly. If you are a minority shareholder of a corporation and have suffered damages by others within the corporation, or by the corporation itself, the Commercial Litigation team at Robinson & Henry can help.
Our attorneys have formidable experience in protecting shareholder rights, and have helped obtain recovery of damages for shareholders who have already been adversely affected by corporate oppression. Stand up for yourself as a minority shareholder. Call 303-688-0944 for your free case assessment.